23rd Georgia Infantry
23rd Georgia at Chancellorsville
Home | Soldiers History of the 23rd | Field & Staff | 23rd's Organizational Time Line | War Deaths | Ailments | Co. A Roster | Co B Roster | 23rd at Chancellorsville | Co. C Roster | Co. D Roster | Co. E Roster | Battle Reports | Co. F Roster | Co. G Roster | Co. H Roster | Co. I Roster | Co. I Roster | Co. K Roster | Contact | Wm Wms Co. C Service | John Avery Letters Co. F | G.W. Carter Co. A letters | Tms P. Forrester letters Co. E | Diary of Sam'l Burdett Co. A | Felix W Isreal Letter Co. K | Miller Collins Letters 1862 | Miller Collins Letters 1863 | Miller Collins Letters 1864 | Fight at Catherine's Furnace | John Barnes Letter Co. B | W.S. House's Pardon Co. C | DSA Griffeth Letters Co. C | Memior of Sam Hammontree Co. E | Letters of Wm Thomas Co. C | Step Roberts Letter Co.I | Diary G W Hunnicutt Co. G | Diary of Willaim L Fisher Co. K | Robert E Lawhon Co. F | Diary of Wm H Smith, Co. I | H.W.B. Letter | The Sinking of the CSS SUMTER | Martin V Brewer Reminiscence Co. C | E.F. Best Court Martial | Reminiscences of H W Barclay

Below is 23rds involvement at the Battle of Chancellorsville May 3rd 1863, from the book "The Second United States Sharp Shooters in the Civil War: a history and roster" by Gerald L Earley

...At sunrise on May 2nd, 1863, the sharpshooters' corps commander, Major General daniel Sickles, rode out with General Hooker to inspect the Federal lines to the west of Chancellorsville. From this it is obvious that Hooker intended to wait for Lee to make the next move. On returning to headquarters,Hooker ordered Sickles "to make a reconnaissance in front and to the left of Chancellorsville." The combative Sickles was happy to comply, sending out the 11th Massachusetts and 26th Pennsylvania. "A detachment of Berdan's Sharpshooters, from Whipples division, accompanied each regiment." The accompanying sharpshooters were apparently from companies E and K of the 1st U.S.S.S. The remainder of Berdan's two regiments remained in the lines near Chancellorsville that morning.
...This reconnassaince encountered Lee's skirmishers and pickets fronting his position east of Chancellorsville. There was some sharp skirmishing during the reconnaissance and differing accounts of the sharpshooters' performance emerged after the battle. According to sharpshooter Charles Stevens years after the battle, the infantry pressed too close to the enemy and suffered "considerable," but the two detachments of sharpshooters actively dodged through the woods and "wonderfully escaped."
...However, this story does not match the account from the battle report of Lt. Colonel Porter Tripp of the 11th Massachusetts Infantry. According to Colonel Tripp, "the sharshooters sent with the regiment, shamefully ran away from the enemy's fire," so the colonel was forced to "advance his own men, armed only with smooth-bore Springfield muskets, to take thier place." This report was echoed by Colonel William Bliasdell in his report for the 1st Brigade. Bliasdell noted that the sharpshooters were impossible to keep at the front and were censured in "the highest terms" for thier conduct during the reconnaissance. The massachusetts men were armed with Model 1842 Smoothbore Muskets, little better then shotguns, putting them at a greater disadvantage as skirmihers. This would explain why in Stevens's account pressed so closely with the enemy.
...This was not the first or only time the !st U.S.S.S. drew criticism when operating with infantry. There was increasingly dislike for sharpshooters from both armies as the war progressed. Most mention of the sharpshooters in official reports was favorable, but the Federal army never fully developed and utilized the sharpshooter concept. It is possible that the unfavorable perception of infantry commanders, unfamiar with sharpshooter techniques, ultimately hindered the expansion and developement of sharpshooter units in the Federal Army.